logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.04.28 2015고단894
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2015 Highest 894 [Defendant] On March 27, 2015, the Defendant driven a Crocketing car without obtaining a driver’s license from around 500 meters from the road located in 246-4, Busan Jin-dong, Busan, Busan, to the front day of Jin-dong, 178-21, 178-21.

【2015 Godan 915, the Defendant driven Done Star Corm from around 14:02 around October 15, 2014 to the front road of the Hosan subway Station located in the Republic of Korea in the same Eup/Myeon from the Do in the Pyeong-si, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si without obtaining a driver’s license on around 14:02.

【2016 order 514】

1. On July 7, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle on or around 10:15, driven C rocketing motor vehicle at 3 km from the pentle-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, to the front of the same Roon steel located in the same Gu Nowon-gu.

2. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on a motor vehicle, driven a straw hotel in the rico hotel in the Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si with a 500-meter strawing car at the 16th straw in the same Dong by the shooting distance.

[2016 Highest 594] On December 30, 2013, the Defendant, at the “H” office operated by the victim G in Busan Northern-gu, the Defendant, “H,” the Defendant received 60 million won from the previous company and paid 40 million won in advance, and there still remains 20 million won at the present time. However, the Defendant is retired from the previous company with a total of 23 million won, including 20 million won and 3 million won for the previous company.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant had been trying to continue to work in the previous (state) I, had no intention to work in H operated by the victim, and some of the borrowed money granted by the injured party was considered to be used as personal living expenses.

The Defendant deceivings the victim as such, and borrowed money from the victim on January 3, 2014.

arrow