A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B(n, 40 years of age) are between the defendant and the victim(n, 40 years of age).

On June 8, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 05:00 on June 8, 2020, at the victim’s residence located in Seosan City, the victim opened the door door door door to the residence and opened the door door door to close the door door, thereby infringing on the victim’s residence.

The defendant is a social work personnel who has worked in E with the 3th floor in E in E in the period of Masan-si.

A social work personnel member shall not leave his/her service or not perform his/her duties in the relevant field for a total period of at least eight days without justifiable grounds.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on May 6, 2020, was absent from office without any justifiable reason for the total period of eight days or more from May 11, 2020 to April 14, 202, and for five days (ten days in total) from May 18, 2020 to February 22, 200, and was absent from office without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

"200 Highest 378"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site photographs of the police statement concerning B;

1. 112 Reporting Table " 2020 Highest 408";

1. Application of the F’s written statement on the defendant’s statutory statement, accusation against those who have resigned from social work service, or statutes governing service records;

1. Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion upon residence, the choice of imprisonment), subparagraph 1 of Article 89-2 of the Military Service Act (the point of escape from military service without prison labor) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, was unable to accept the motive or circumstances leading up to the instant crime, even though he was unable to commit each of the instant crimes, which are not suitable for the nature of the crime.

The defendant is the first offender of the age of 21, and the defendant shows a relatively wrong and reflective attitude in this court, and it is favorable to the defendant that the defendant agreed with the victim of the crime of intrusion upon residence.