beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20,344,356 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 26,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) from May 26, 2017 to June 2019 to Plaintiff B.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The status D as the parties is the lessor of the multi-family house E in Gwangju-do (hereinafter, the instant multi-family house in Gwangju-si), who entered into a lease contract with the Plaintiffs. F is the licensed real estate agent in the G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office and H are the real estate agent in the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, and the Defendant is the real estate mutual aid association affiliated with F and H.
B. (1) On February 15, 2012, Plaintiff A entered into a lease agreement with D with respect to the instant multi-family house as a broker of F, setting the period from April 10, 2012 to April 9, 2014; and the deposit amount of KRW 65 million; on April 10, 2012, Plaintiff A entered into a lease agreement with D; and on April 10, 2012, the said deposit was fully paid and moved in; and the fixed date was obtained on the move-in report on April 18, 2012 and the lease agreement on February 15, 2012.
(2) On June 18, 2012, Plaintiff B entered into a lease agreement with D, setting a period from July 17, 2012 to July 16, 2014, with a deposit amount of KRW 65 million, and entered into the said lease agreement on July 17, 2012 between Plaintiff B and D as a broker of H, and obtained a move-in report and a fixed date on August 8, 2012.
(3) In the instant multi-family house, two cases such as the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage (the maximum amount of claims KRW 338 million and KRW 299 million) in the name of L Cooperatives (after transfer to February 3, 2016) were completed before the Plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement.
C. On December 14, 2015, with respect to the above multi-family house, a voluntary auction procedure was initiated as the Sungwon District Court Branch M in Sung-nam Branch on the process of the auction and the distribution of dividends (1) thereafter by the L Cooperatives’ request for auction.
(2) In the auction procedure, each of the dividends was distributed as indicated in the attached table, and the Plaintiff A received dividends of KRW 14,139,109 in the order of 9, and the Plaintiff B did not receive dividends.
The current status of the lease on the multi-family house of this case, but the multi-family house of this case is a number of lease contracts prior to the contract of the plaintiffs, such as the specifications of the attached sale