beta
Text
1. Defendant D and the Korean Licensed Real Estate Agent Association shall jointly:
A. The plaintiff A is 35 million won and the defendant D is against the plaintiff A.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 3, 2011, Plaintiff C’s loss of the deposit for lease was leased KRW 60,000,000,000 from G on behalf of Defendant D, among the multi-family houses of the building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, KRW 503.2) At the time when Plaintiff C leased the said house, Plaintiff C had several senior lessees (a total of KRW 1.168,000,000,000,000,000,000 won) in addition to the senior collateral security (a total of KRW 1.168,000,000).
The certificate of good offices prepared by Defendant D while acting as a broker for the above lease contract is only indicated as to the above senior security right, and there is no indication as to the existence of the lessee and the security deposit for the other generation of multi-household.
3) On January 30, 2015, Plaintiff C received only KRW 20 million out of the lease deposit as a small lessee on January 30, 2015, from the auction procedure (Seoul Southern District Court H), which was executed with respect to the multi-family house in the building, and the remainder of the lease deposit was not recovered. (B) Plaintiff B leased KRW 65 million from G on May 21, 2012, among the multi-family house in the building, by Defendant D’s brokerage, KRW 307 of the apartment house in the building.
Plaintiff
B After completing a move-in report on December 12, 2012, B obtained a fixed date on the said lease contract.
2) At the time of Plaintiff B’s lease of the said house, there were several prior lessees (the sum total of KRW 2,05,150,000,000,000,000,000) in addition to the prior collateral security (the maximum debt amount of KRW 1,02,000,000). Defendant D’s letter of confirmation prepared in the course of mediating the said lease agreement is only indicated as to the above prior collateral security right, and there is no indication as to the existence of the lessee and the deposit for the other households of multi-household housing. 3) Plaintiff B did not receive any dividends at all from the auction procedure (Seoul Southern District Court H) executed with respect to the multi-family
C. On August 23, 2012, Plaintiff A lost the deposit for lease.