logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.27 2016가단57060
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s wage case against the Plaintiff is the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2009Kadan246862 Decided January 20, 2010.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant filed a claim against the Plaintiff as Seoul Central District Court Decision 2009Kadan246862, and on January 20, 2010, the above court rendered a judgment that “the Plaintiff shall pay to the Defendant the amount of KRW 70 million and the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 5% per annum from September 22, 2007 to June 3, 2009, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment (hereinafter “instant judgment”), and the judgment of this case became final and conclusive around that time.

B. Based on the instant judgment, the Defendant received the claim attachment and collection order with respect to the Plaintiff’s wage claim against C as Seoul Western District Court 2010TT 8578 on June 18, 2010, and the above order was served to C around that time; ② on July 15, 2010, the Seoul Western District Court 2010TT 1023 issued the Plaintiff’s wage claim attachment and collection order with respect to the Plaintiff’s wage claim against D; ③ on March 18, 2016, the above order was served to D; ③ on March 18, 2016, the Seoul Western District Court 2016T 1017 issued the claim attachment and collection order with respect to the Plaintiff’s wage claim against E Hospital; and the above order was served to E Hospital on March 22, 2016.

C. Meanwhile, the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 2010TT 23095, the same court No. 2011T 1827, and the same court No. 2012T 6765, respectively, issued a collection order against the Defendant’s claim against the Republic of Korea.

The defendant received reimbursement of KRW 2,574,072 from the plaintiff before requesting a collection order, as stated in Section 2 of the above paragraph.

E. D: (a) on the ground that the respective orders for seizure and collection of the Defendant and the Plaintiff’s other obligees are concurrent, Seoul Western District Court 2010No. 3094; (b) the same court 2010 No. 3095; (c) No. 3044 of the same court; (d) No. 2011 Gold and 5482 of the same court; (e) No. 2011 Gold and 7747 of the same court; (e) No. 1410 of the same court; (e) No. 2012 Gold and 3583 of the same court; and (e) No. 20151 of the same court.

arrow