The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), it is difficult to see that victims suffered bodily injury in light of various circumstances at the time of the accident, and the victims have been able to recover naturally, and thus it cannot be deemed that they suffered bodily injury, which is the premise of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment,

B. Even if the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc.) is established against the victims of unreasonable sentencing, the sentence of the court below (a fine of five million won) is too unreasonable in light of the fact that there is no criminal conviction against the defendant and that there was

2. Determination

A. The Defendant, at around 16:00 on March 16, 2013, driven the said car and tried to make a U-turn at a speed of about 35 kilometers in the middle-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. and the front side of the two-lane road in the middle-gu, U.S., U.S., U.S., and the middle-gu, U.S., U.S., U.S., in one-lane from the north-gu, U.S

Since there is a yellow central line installed, in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to make a U-turn at the U.S. permissible point, but the defendant neglected this duty and neglected to do so, and thereby he was able to receive the front part of the E-A-U-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence inflicted an injury on the affected party D, such as satisfe, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, on the part of the injured party F (the 54 years of age) who was on the said A-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed