1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs who are ordered to pay additional amounts below.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance was modified as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Part 8, 11 of the Judgment of the first instance is to be followed by the following parts:

The plaintiffs' above negligence had been caused by the occurrence and expansion of the damages of this case. Considering these circumstances, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as mentioned above and the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 18 through 20, namely, ① The apartment house of this case was constructed on the 7th floor size above the ground, and it was used as 42 studio in total by illegally remodeling the second class neighborhood living facilities (office, 2 through 7th level above the ground, even though the office, 2 through 7th level above the ground level) on the general building ledger, and it was used as 42 units in total due to the fact that the defendant C and D had already arranged the lease agreement of other houses of this case on several occasions, and it was relatively well known that it is difficult for the plaintiffs to recover the entire amount of the deposit due to small tenants, etc., and ② the defendant D did not notify the plaintiffs of the fact that it is difficult to identify the "right relationship of the building" in the description of the right to the "right to the present multi-family house of this case."