Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s damage to property and interference with his duties around 15:50 on January 12, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s bath business by making customers who were in a public bath with approximately 20 minutes of pulse 20 minutes of the market price owned by the victim, which was kept in a public room without any reason under the influence of alcohol, take one plastic willer in a size equivalent to 12,000 won, putting them out of the public bath, and taking them out of the public bath business.

2. Defendant B’s assault committed assault on the part of Defendant B, at the time and place described in paragraph (1), and upon the report of the victim E (51 tax) who is the owner of the business, the police officer called the victim, who was dispatched to the police officer in order to listen to the instant statements, and, in order to hear the statements related to the instant case, he saw the victim’s bomb and pushed the victim’s breath, and assaulted the victim

3. The Defendants who interfere with the Defendants’ performance of their official duties are in receipt of the 112 report to the public bath and obstruct the business of destroying and obstructing the public bath at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and are asked by the assistant H and policeman affiliated with the G police box in the Seosung-dong Police Station G police box in the Sungsung-dong Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene, to ask questions about the circumstances of the case from I, and the Defendant A had a warrant

The term “H’s chest” refers to the hand, the Defendant B pushed the Ha’s chest by hand, pushed the I’s chest and shoulder, pushed the me with the Defendant A’s son, pushed the I’s chest and shoulder with the Defendant A, pushed the I’s leg with her hand, pushed the Defendant A’s chest and shoulder, cut the son’s breast, cut the Ha’s breast, cut the Ha’s legs with the Defendant B, and assaulted the Ha’s bridge with the Defendant B.

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to data on photographs at the scene of damage and CCTV image analysis photographs;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense: Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destruction of property) and Article 314 of the Criminal Act.