beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In a traffic accident that occurred around September 1, 2016, the Defendant thought that police officers did not intentionally show the other driver's body image, and that police officers did not object to the police station.
On September 5, 2016, at around 20:59, the Defendant reported to 112 a mobile phone located in an influorial place located in the Suwon-si filmdong, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and reported to 112 that “A police officer was suffering from a traffic accident. A police officer made a traffic accident to B. B. The inspector made it to the other party. I also reported to her. I want to die. I want to go to the Korean National Police Agency and the Public Prosecutor’s Office.” On September 5, 2016, around 22:55, 2016, the Defendant purchased four times of sporadide oil (135ml) in the convenience store near the Suwon-si, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, the Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, the head of which was 199, and invaded into the above Police Station C office.
The Defendant has received a traffic accident from the horse sprinking of the traffic police at the above office. The sprinking police officer caused the traffic accident to be the perpetrator of the traffic accident. Even though the traffic police, such as bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, it is not necessary to be the perpetrator. The bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitbbbbb, and it does not seem to have been broken at the site of the accident, and it does not show it. The Defendant took a bath theory that bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch at the plastic paper on the floor, and took it into account as “I will bit bit bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bits at the bottom.”
Accordingly, the defendant intrudes on a building managed by people, and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petitions and criminal investigations by police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of the police statement law to D;
1. Criminal facts;