The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was under contact with the wife prior to the instant accident, and returned to the house urgently, and the defendant issued the victim D (hereinafter referred to as the "victim") immediately after the instant accident, and received the accident of the automobile comprehensive insurance company to which the defendant subscribed, and there are circumstances to consider the situation as being taken into account in order to take the wife out of the instant site in an emergency room after taking the accident into the vehicle comprehensive insurance company to which the defendant joined, and there are circumstances to consider the situation, such as the defendant agreed with the victim, the defendant’s economic situation is difficult, and the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant. In light of the above, the punishment imposed by the court below (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime is deemed to have escaped to avoid the detection of drunk driving in light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s act of causing a traffic accident that causes damage to the damaged vehicle temporarily stopped by the Defendant; and (b) the nature of the crime is not good; (c) the victim once set the Defendant at the end of a large amount of 600 meters immediately after the accident, but the Defendant again left the scene; (d) the Defendant made a statement that he was sniffing the Defendant at the time of dividing the conversation with the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant also made a statement that the Defendant was sniffing the Defendant at the time, considering the fact that it appears that the Defendant escaped to avoid the detection of drunk driving; and (e) all other circumstances, including the character, conduct, and environment of the Defendant, which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable, and thus, the above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.