Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

After the occurrence of a traffic accident, the Defendant filed a report directly with 112, but the Defendant finds water as a horse.

The water can only be taken out by a nearby towing vehicle, but it did not escape from the scene.

The sentencing of the court below's decision on unfair sentencing (three years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The judgment of the court below on the assertion of mistake or misapprehension of the legal principles as follows: ① The victim F made a statement at the police station immediately after the accident, ② the victim F made a statement to the police officer who was dispatched to the traffic accident site that he was not a driver, and was arrested to the police officer at around 100 meters from the scene of the accident; on May 27, 2014, at the telephone call with the police station, the defendant was sent to the scene of the accident and was arrested at the scene of the accident; ② the defendant was sent to the scene of the accident, ② the defendant stated that the police officer's question whether he was a driver at the scene of the accident was "the driver is not the driver of the accident" (Evidence No. 17, No. 17, No. 269 of the evidence record); ③ The victim at the time of the accident was an imminent situation that was sent to the victim at the scene of the accident, but it was hard to recognize the defendant's escape from the scene to the scene of the accident, making it difficult to obtain the defendant's escape from the scene.

This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

It is reasonable to take into account the fact that the defendant's family-type of the defendant's decision on the argument of unfair sentencing is not good and that he must support his mother.

However, the instant vehicle driving-related crime is not covered by mandatory insurance in the state of being drunk by the Defendant.