logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.06.14 2018고정25
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 4, 2017, at around 04:20, the Defendants jointly 04:20 on the road of “D” located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, on the ground that they knew about them and made the victim E (22 tax age)’s insulting remarks, and Defendant A was a vision for drinking, and Defendant A was satisfing the victim’s face at a time and pushed back, and Defendant F was satfed with the victim’s satch, satisfing the victim’s satch, satfing the victim’s satch, and Defendant G assaulted the victim’s eat.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the 14-day cryp dump of cryp that requires treatment on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A H statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. He asserts that a CD (the Defendant only had a physical contact during the process of speaking a ditch between the victim and F, and that there was no assault against the victim.

However, at the time of the instant case, the Defendant, F, and G were the victim and the victim. At the investigative agency, the victim stated in detail the details of the assault and the details of the assault by the Defendant, etc., and in this court, there was no person who was assaulted by the Defendant, etc., and the victim did not speak during

was stated.

According to the black image of a vehicle parked near the site of this case, it is found that the defendant was partially aware of the shape of the defendant's knife with the victim and the head of the knife with his hand, and the knife of the bridge. At that time, there is no special body fighting between the victim and the F.

Therefore, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant merely had a physical contact with the victim during the process of expressing the relationship between the victim and F, and rather, according to each of the above evidence, it can be acknowledged that the Defendant committed an injury by assaulting the victim jointly with F and G according to each of the above evidence).

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow