The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment requires strict punishment for narcotics offenders in light of the fact that the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case while committing the crime of this case and supports children who are mentally disabled persons, etc. However, the crime of this case is found to require strict punishment and eradication of the crime of this case in light of the addiction to narcotics and harm caused by administration of narcotics due to the detection of remaining phiphones after the defendant offered them to other narcotics offenders. In particular, the crime of providing narcotics in this case requires strict punishment as it distributes narcotics to other persons by placing them in the crime of this case; the quantity of the phone handled by the defendant to the investigation agency for the crime of this case is not a large amount; the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for the above crimes of this case (one life line): the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime of this case; the defendant has no history of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime of this case; the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for the second time from 2 years to 3 years; the defendant's recommendation for sale and purchase of the same kind of crime of this case.

3. Conclusion.