Text
1. The development of Defendant Hyundai Industrial Development Co., Ltd and Defendant Daton Industry Co., Ltd. are jointly conducted by the Plaintiff 22,434.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. B, around 11:50 on December 9, 2013, around 11:50, 2013, driven a C Twitler owned by the Defendant Electric Cargo Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and shocked the boomer’s boomer at the end of the booming boom at the end of the boomer’s boom in Busan Northern-dong, the entrance of five parts of the brea-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-only (hereinafter “instant construction”) without finding in advance the boom boom cost of the Dricker’s boom at the entrance of the front.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
The plaintiff is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with the plaintiff vehicle.
On June 12, 2013, the Defendant Hyundai Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Hyundai Industries Development”) subcontracted the construction of the management office and charge station building facilities to the Defendant Ston Industry Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Ston Industry Development”), the development of the Defendant Ston Industry on July 22, 2013, among which, on August 7, 2013, the development of the instant complex panel was conducted by Hanjin Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Seman Industries”), and the Chowon Industries re-subcontracted the complex panel construction works to the U.S. Patech Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Sack”), Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Sack”), a private entrepreneur operating the building company’s trade name on the date of the instant accident, and installed the charge on the outer wall of the instant case.