beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition, etc.;
A. In accordance with Article 23 of the Ordinance on the Relocation of Do Offices to the Do Offices on June 9, 2008 for the relocation of the Do Offices to the Do Offices and the construction of the Do Offices to the Do Offices to the Do Offices, the Do Governor designated and publicly announced the Do Offices as the planned site for the relocation of the Do Offices to the Do Offices (No. 2008-398 of the Do Offices to the Do Offices to the Do Offices (hereinafter referred to as the “pre-determined site announcement of June 9, 2008”), Article 6 of the Special Act on the Construction and Support of Urban Areas for the Relocation of Do Offices to the Do Offices on May 4, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act on the Relocation of Do Offices”).
(B) The implementer of the project was designated and publicly announced as the prospective development area of KRW 10,965,784,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00
C. On June 10, 2011, the Defendant requested consultation on compensation for losses against the owner of land, etc. to be incorporated into the instant project district, including the Plaintiffs, on August 17, 201, urging each consultation compensation on September 7, 201, and November 10, 201, and notified that the land transfer subject to consultation should be excluded from the supply of housing site and land for countermeasures.
The defendant did not comply with the consultation compensation on the ground that the plaintiffs' compensation is low, and applied for the adjudication of expropriation to the City/Do Land Tribunal, and according to the result of the adjudication of expropriation, the land, etc. owned by the plaintiffs in the project district of this case was delivered.
E. Meanwhile, on October 15, 2013, the Defendant’s living measures and subjects of the instant project as follows.