1. All of the plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. Defendant Gyeongbuk-do Development Corporation shall be Nos. A, B, C (No. 3) and 3.

1. Details of ruling;

A. Designation of the planned area for the relocation of the border road to the Do government office, - Public announcement of the planned area of June 9, 2008, under Article 23 of the Ordinance on the Relocation of the border road to the Do government office (hereinafter referred to as the “Ordinance of this case”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Ordinance”).

- Purpose: Relocation of the Gyeong-do Office and construction of a city located in the jurisdiction of the Do Office - The location of the planned area: The area of the Dong-do Office of Pungcheon-gun, Ancheon-do.

(b) project approval and public notice - project approval and public notice - project implementation (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”) for the construction of the new city (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”) to the Gyeongbuk-do on May 4, 2010, No. 2010-168, May 10, 2010, Notice No. 2010-177, and Notice No. 2011-334, August 26, 201; Defendant Corporation:

C. The Defendant Committee’s ruling of expropriation on February 2, 2012 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”): Land and obstacles listed on the Plaintiffs’ list and obstacles list (hereinafter “each of the instant land and obstacles”): Compensation for losses: Each “adjudication of expropriation” list of the annexed land lists and obstacles.

- From the starting date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on March 22, 2012 - An appraisal corporation and a central appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”)

D. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on February 22, 2013 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - Contents of the adjudication: The same shall be as indicated in the attached Form’s list of land and each list of obstacles.

- An appraisal corporation: Each entry in Gap's evidence (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul's evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 14, and the purport of the whole pleadings, which are the grounds for recognition, 【Appraisal of Objection' (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal of Objection")

2. Determination as to the primary claim against the defendant committee

A. The Defendant 1 Corporation merely provided the notification of compensation price to the Plaintiffs, who are owners of land, etc., and did not discuss any discussion.