The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. At around 16:00 on December 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered the council of occupants’ representatives located in the office where the victim E (year 52) is located in the same place; (b) discovered a business report at the bed meeting room and asked the victim who was asked to “whether he or she entered without permission; and (c) expressed his or her reply that “the victim entered the house with permission”; and (d) assaulted the Defendant as his or her hand once.

2. The offense of assault is a crime that cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim (Article 260(1) and (3) of the Criminal Act). Since the victim expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the defendant on July 16, 2014 after the indictment of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.