logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.12.04 2014고단3274
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 23:50 on October 11, 2014, the Defendant, despite having no intent to pay a taxi fee, was on board a taxi at the remote distance in the open-air market in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Defendant, despite the absence of an intention to pay a taxi fee, was on board a Dbu-si operated by the victim C (hereinafter “C”) as a customer, who is a taxi engineer, was the victim of a long-term prisoner of war, and made a false statement as if he/she would pay a taxi fee upon arrival at a destination.

The Defendant had the victim operate a taxi from the above shooting distance to the front day of the Ulsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Inspector of the Motor Vehicle at the 8 Ulsan Metropolitan City from the same distance to 24:00 on the same day, and did not pay approximately KRW 4,000 of the taxi fee.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested a slope F belonging to the Ulsannam Police Station E-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City police station, which was called for a 112 taxi engineer’s return and called for a string string to a string string, on the front side of the Ulsan Motor Vehicle Inspection Station, such as Paragraph (1) on October 12, 2014; (b) that the Defendant did not pay the string of the string 200:0; and (c) requested that the string of the string string string

Accordingly, F did not take part in the patrol, such as defect, i.e., e., e., fe., f., e., e., f., e., e., f. e., e., e., f. e., e., e., e., e.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the suppression and control of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to F and C

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act on Probation.

arrow