logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.03.20 2019고단4702
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has been engaged in accounting and commercial building management in Daejeon Jung-gu Real Estate Lease Business Co., Ltd.

1. On August 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) drafted a private document forgery; (b) drafted a statement that “TB million won shall be redeemed on August 28, 2018 by using a computer without authority for the purpose of exercising at the office in the office in the Jung-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City D Building E-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the loan of August 24, 2018; (c) provided that “TB million won shall be redeemed on August 28, 2018; and (d) written and printed the lender as “C representative F of the Co., Ltd.’s Co., Ltd.’s Co., Ltd.’s office” with the content that “the transfer of registration under D Building E and the transfer of ownership shall be KRW 10 million shall be KRW 00,000,000,000”; and (d) forged a receipt of forged loan under the name of the C representative F’s name, and exercised

2. The defrauded issued a forged loan certificate to the victim G at the same date and time, and at the same place, the Defendant stated that “The amount of money to be paid for the D building sold in lots by the company in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. is necessary. It is difficult for the company to make it difficult, and only KRW 30 million will be repaid. 4 million.”

However, in fact, the Defendant thought that the money borrowed from the victim would be used to prevent the repayment of the personal debt for approximately KRW 100 million with the personal debt, and that the money borrowed from the victim would also be used to prevent the repayment of the personal debt. In providing the above D subparagraph of the D building as security for the money borrowed from the victim, such as the above loan certificate, even though there was no delegation of authority from the representative of the C in charge of the LOB, the borrower arbitrarily forged and issued the F's loan certificate, and there was no other intent or ability to pay the above loan properly.

The defendant makes such a false statement and belongs to it.

arrow