Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and six months, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on February 22, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to three years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the Seoul Central District Court on two years, and the sentence was finalized on May 18, 2013, and is the representative director of the I corporation established for the purpose of selling computers and Nowon-gu in the electronic shopping district located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, and is the subject of the JJ, a service opening agency of the SK Telecom.

Defendant

B From December 2008 to December 201, 2010, L is operated by Seoul K for the purpose of selling computers and Nowon-gu.

From July 2009, in order to attract the subscribers to the services, the victim SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "victim Co., Ltd.") established a system by which the long-term service users can purchase the North Korean street at an expensive rate during the service use period from July 2009 to July 36, 200, and the opening agency which concluded an entrustment contract with the victim company first purchased the North Korean street model designated by the victim company and then entered the user's personal information in the computer network of the victim company, entered the user's personal information and the number of the user in the computer network of the victim company, and then issued the relevant No. North Korean street with the core chips, the victim company operated in the way that the employee company would provide No. 307, in a lump sum payment and the opening subsidy to the opening agency after the month.

1. Defendant A, after ascertaining the purchase and payment of the unit of the unit in question to the main office of the unit in collusion with subordinate recruitment business operators M (N companies),O (P companies), B (P companies), and R, etc. by abusing the fact that the victim company entered or notified the unit of the unit in the unit of the unit in the computer, Defendant A conspired with the main office of the victim company M (N companies), the main office of the unit in the unit of the unit in order to recruit persons in need of the unit of the unit, and then falsely join the victim company as the main office of the main office of the victim company through J.