Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Around January 2, 2012, Defendant B received the claim against the victim E (the age of 50) from D, and urged Defendant B to pay his/her debt by finding out his/her address at the victim’s address or making a cell phone call at least four times from April 2, 2012 to July 2, 2012.

그러던 중 피고인들은 2012. 5. 28. 16:30경 하남시 F 앞 노상에서 피해자를 만나 피고인 B은 “빨리 돈을 갚지 않으면 신상에 좋지 않다, 우선 500만 원을 주지 않으면 당장 집 비울 생각해라, 그렇지 않으면 성남 애들, 인천 애들 풀어서 집으로 쳐들어오겠다, 덩치가 큰 애들이 집에서 뒹굴거리고 하면 골치 아프니까 알아서 해라, 너희 자식들 다 큰 것 같은데 학교 그만두게 하고 돈 벌어서 빌린 돈이나 갚게 해라”고 말하고, 피고인 A는 “오늘 안 되면 난리를 칠 것인데, 나는 험한 꼴을 여러 번 봤다, 성남 애들 하남에서 가까우니 부르면 바로 온다, 덩치 큰 애들이 방안에 들어가서 생활하면 힘들 것인데”라고 말하는 등 마치 조직 폭력배와 연관되어 있는 것처럼 행동하여 피해자를 겁주었다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly got 5,00,000 won as the deposit passbook in Defendant B’s name for the interest of the victim who frightened the victim.

2. The Defendants alleged that they did not find the victim on the date and time stated in the facts charged, and Defendant A made a little verbal abuse in the course of demanding the victim to repay their debts by telephone, but the victim did not pay money to the victim. Defendant B did not attack the victim as stated in the facts charged nor ordered the victim A to attack him.

3. The burden of proof of the facts charged in a criminal trial for judgment is the prosecutor and the conviction is the same.