logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2016.11.10 2016고정11
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are members of the Daejeon North Korea Branch E-dong Branch E (hereinafter referred to as the “MMMMM”) affiliated with E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “E”) production workers in Youngdong Factory as a branch affiliated with the National Metal Trade Union, which is an industrial trade union at a nationwide level.

On July 31, 2015, the Defendants conspired with members of the metal labor union, the name of which is unknown, and the distribution of the newsletters by the victim G (52 years of age) who is the head of the E-dong Factory cafeteria located in the E-dong F of the Chungcheongbuk-gun, and the head of the E-trade union (hereinafter referred to as the “E union”) around the E-dong Factory cafeteria on July 31, 2015. The Defendants used the victim’s clothes part of the metal labor union branch in his/her hand and used the victim’s back part of the back part of the victim’s clothes, and thereby the victim suffered approximately 14 days of treatment on the left side and the left side part of the complete part.

In light of the progress, etc. of the trial within the scope recognized as identical to the facts charged, if the court does not give a substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense, it may recognize the minor facts constituting an offense ex officio without changing the indictment.

The facts charged in the instant case, stating that the Defendant jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, include the facts charged of the injury by assault, stating that “the Defendant conspiredd to do so, and thereby inflicted an injury on the victim,” which falls within the same scope, and even if the facts charged of the injury by assault in light of the process of the deliberation of the instant case are acknowledged, it would be deemed that there would be no substantial disadvantage in the exercise of the Defendants’ right to defense. Therefore, the Defendants should be acknowledged as having committed each injury by assault ex officio without going through the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The video CD, each.

arrow