Text
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff was a law firm, which was drafted on August 22, 2011.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 24, 2011, the Defendant lent KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff’s husband C (the Defendant’s D’s loan was deposited from January 24, 201), and the Plaintiff jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligation against the Defendant. The Defendant, other than the Defendant, lent KRW 30 million to C on March 14, 2013, KRW 30 million to the Defendant on April 18, 2014, KRW 2010,000,000 to the Defendant on April 14, 201, KRW 201,000,000,000 to the Defendant on April 14, 201, KRW 201,000,000,000 to the Defendant on April 22, 2011, and KRW 301,000,0000,000 to the Defendant’s 201,013.
(d) The Defendant prepared and issued a loan certificate to the effect that “this case’s loan certificate” (hereinafter “this case’s loan certificate”). The Defendant’s title as the title of the notarial deed of this case is the benefit of which the balance after deducting the tax and public charges from the monthly salary (this salary and allowance) and all other nominal benefits exceeds 1.5 million won.