logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2015.11.06 2014가단19992
청구이의
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff was a law firm, which was drafted on August 22, 2011.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 24, 2011, the Defendant lent KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff’s husband C (the Defendant’s D’s loan was deposited from January 24, 201), and the Plaintiff jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligation against the Defendant. The Defendant, other than the Defendant, lent KRW 30 million to C on March 14, 2013, KRW 30 million to the Defendant on April 18, 2014, KRW 2010,000,000 to the Defendant on April 14, 201, KRW 201,000,000,000 to the Defendant on April 14, 201, KRW 201,000,000,000 to the Defendant on April 22, 2011, and KRW 301,000,0000,000 to the Defendant’s 201,013.

(d) The Defendant prepared and issued a loan certificate to the effect that “this case’s loan certificate” (hereinafter “this case’s loan certificate”). The Defendant’s title as the title of the notarial deed of this case is the benefit of which the balance after deducting the tax and public charges from the monthly salary (this salary and allowance) and all other nominal benefits exceeds 1.5 million won.

arrow