Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On October 1, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Daegu District Court for a period of eight months, and on June 10, 201, the sentence of the said suspension was invalidated on September 26, 201 upon being sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., at the Seog District Court Branch Branch Branch of Daegu District Court on June 10, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive, and on October 15, 2012, the execution of the said sentence was completed.
In addition, on December 7, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Seoggu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court to be punished by larceny; on May 25, 2009, from the Seoggu District Public Prosecutor's Office to transfer juvenile protection cases to larceny; on June 23, 2009, from the same public prosecutor's office to the same public prosecutor's office to transfer juvenile protection cases to larceny; and on July 6, 2009, from the same public prosecutor's office to the same public prosecutor's office to transfer juvenile protection cases to a special larceny.
【Criminal Facts】
On December 19, 2012, at around 19:10, the Defendant committed a theft of money and valuables from another person’s vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “motor vehicle hair”) in order to raise the clater fee from the Hansung-dong, 945-6, Yongsan-gu, Daegu-gu, 19:10.
The Defendant, who was parked at the bed, opened a driver’s seat that was not corrected by the victim W X car, and entered into the bed, tried to cut off property, such as following the inside of the vehicle, but failed to find stolen objects, and did not bring about an attempted crime.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually attempted to steals the victim's property, but he attempted to do so.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Written statement by the police;
1. Previous records of judgment: A inquiry report on criminal records, etc. and investigation report (attached to a judgment, etc.);
1. Habituality of judgment: Application of damp-style Acts and subordinate statutes in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, the period in which the crime was committed again after the release, and the same kind of crime committed repeatedly;
1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;