logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.10.11 2013노1975
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum term of one year and short term of ten months.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor for a maximum term of one year and short term of ten months) of the lower court is excessively unreasonable.

2. Ex officio determination

A. On the basis of ex officio examination, the prosecutor applied for changes in the indictment of this case as follows, and the court permitted changes in the indictment of this case, which led to no longer maintained by the court below.

B. On July 15, 2013 and August 12, 2013, the prosecutor of the revised facts charged filed an application for permission to amend the indictment adding the charges to the charges on two occasions. In addition to the charges added to the initial facts charged, the prosecutor arranged them in the order of time.

[2] On July 5, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of indictment for larceny in the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office on October 21, 201, to transfer juvenile protection cases to the Seogu District Prosecutors' Office on December 7, 2011, to the District Prosecutors' Office on December 7, 201, to transfer juvenile protection cases to the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office on February 22, 2012, to the Juvenile Department on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) in the Seo-gu District Prosecutors' Office at the Seo-gu District Prosecutors' Office on February 24, 2012; to transfer juvenile protection cases from the Seo-gu District Prosecutors' Office to the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office on March 12, 2012; to transfer juvenile larceny cases from the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office to the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office on March 25, 2012; to transfer juvenile larceny cases from the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office on June 21, 2012 to the District Prosecutors's Office.

2. 2 The judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant, habitually,

1. January 31, 2013

arrow