1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to C vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).

Around 14:40 on January 2, 2018, Defendant 1 changed the lane from the second-lane to the second-lane in the vicinity of the 230 underground street to the second-lane in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was predicted by the lower part of the lower lower-class gate of the Plaintiff 1, who is driving the first-lane.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). On January 4, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the E oriental medical hospital (hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff was diagnosed at the E oriental medical hospital, with each of the salt and tensions of the patriarch, and with no open two meines.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, each entry in Gap 2 through 4 (including paper numbers)]

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the facts above, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

B. (1) According to the evidence evidence No. 5 of the scope of the liability for damages, the Plaintiff may acknowledge the fact that the Plaintiff received medical treatment by being hospitalized in Franchisium on the ground of the trend from January 9, 2018 to the 15th day of the same month, each of the climatic salt, and tension. As such, during the aforementioned hospitalization period, at least five days of the working days sought by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is deemed to have at least 549,095 won per day (=109,819 won per day x 5 days).

Furthermore, the plaintiff asserts that he lost his ability to work for 34.6% for six months due to damage to the landscape caused by the accident in this case, and accordingly, sought a lost income of 4,943,762 won, and according to the result of the physical appraisal commission for the head of the first instance court's G hospital, while the plaintiff complained of negorithic and appraisal, while the plaintiff complained of negorithic pains, light frithic pains, and radioactive radioactive rays without right side, the special egorithic is not observed in the lethic book. In the lethic book, the gap of the lethic signboard is narrow and the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e