logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고합161
뇌물수수등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months and by a fine of thirty million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From March 2010 to September 2013, the Defendant, while working as the environmental green belt and D team leader in the Incheon Free Economic Zone authority, managed and supervised the bid and construction of facilities for automatic collection of household wastes, maintenance of facilities, and supply of facilities. From September 2013 to August 2016, the Defendant is currently serving as the D and F team leader in the Incheon Metropolitan City Environment Green Area, and is currently serving as G from August 2016 to February 2017.

1. The Defendant ordered the Incheon Free Economic Zone Authority and received a bribe by receiving cash of KRW 11 million from the International Representative J at the Incheon Free Economic Zone Authority’s parking lot located in Yeonsu-gu, Incheon Free Economic Zone Authority from August 2010 to March 2013, with respect to “construction of automatic H-living waste collection facilities” from the “construction of automatic H-living waste collection facilities,” the Defendant granted the exclusive right to supply waste disposal facilities, etc. installed in an apartment building, etc. established after the construction of the said construction, and received the bribe.

2. On October 2014, the Defendant received the request from the J to make efforts by the Defendant through the environmental green belt in the Incheon Free Economic Zone Office, the immediately preceding workplace of the Defendant, and the D Team manager, so that I can participate in and supply input facilities, etc., even in the “construction of automatic collection facilities for K living wastes,” which will soon proceed in the future, and received a bribe in relation to the referral of matters falling under the duties of other public officials by taking advantage of his status as a public official who received the delivery of household appliances worth KRW 6.5 million through I’s subcontractor representative M, the lower court.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against J;

1. Each prosecutor's investigation report (A shall be accompanied by the register, etc. of rocketing vehicles, which was owned by it and changed in the name of the I, and a report to confirm the receipt of home appliances by the suspect A, and a report to confirm the receipt of home appliances by the suspect)

1. Article 129 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment.

arrow