logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.09 2015고정597
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 29, 2014, around 07:00 on 07:0, the Defendant took care of the victim E(58 years of age) at the entrance guard room located in Ssung-si, where the victim E(58 years of age) was launded, and took care of the victim's face, and took care of the victim's breast part, and 4 days of treatment for about 28 days, the Defendant laid the body of the victim's face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each report on investigation into a telephone (two-time telephone survey);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument and the defense counsel asserted that, while denying the facts charged, the victim's act did not constitute self-defense to escape from the victim, the victim's chest was satisfyed once by hand in order to let the victim satisfy at the time of the denial of the facts charged, and satisfy the victim's chest at the time of satisfy, and satfy in order to get the victim's satch from satching and unsatisfying the Defendant's satch. The defendant's act did not constitute self-defense to escape from the victim.

2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the victim E’s statement is consistent and specific; (b) the witness F also stated that the Defendant and the victim were satisfed with each other; (c) the Defendant voluntarily stated that the Defendant was satisfed by the Defendant’s act at the time of the police; and (d) the injury part and degree in the injury written in the injury diagnosis correspond to the victim’s statement, the criminal facts of the Defendant’s judgment can be acknowledged.

arrow