logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.07.25 2013고단2930 (1)
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an employee of D who operated the “C” located in Daegu Northern-gu B.

After sending the word "small-sum loans" to many unspecified persons collected through the Internet without permission, the name-free persons operating TM (teM) companies explained that if they open the mobile phone at the time of loan consultation, they can borrow from the mobile phone, and if they repay the loans, they will terminate the mobile phone and will not claim the mobile phone fees. In addition, if the loan applicant sent a copy of identification card necessary for the loan, a copy of the certificate of personal seal impression, and a copy of the passbook account (hereinafter "identification card") by facsimile, etc., he/she sold it to the above D for KRW 450,50,000.

The above D shall instruct the Defendant to prepare an application for joining a mobile phone using a copy, etc. of the identification card of the loan applicant purchased from TM companies, and the Defendant, after preparing an application for joining a mobile phone, sent it to the agency and opened the mobile phone in the name of the loan applicant, and the opened mobile phone was disposed of to a third party in the name of the loan applicant and charged the mobile phone fee, etc. to the loan applicant, and the Defendant conspiredd with the above D in order to commit the crime.

According to the above public offering, the Defendant: (a) at the office of “C” on October 19, 2012; and (b) at the above office of “C”, the Defendant received documents from the loan applicant to open the mobile phone in the name of the loan applicant; (c) received opening allowances from the mobile phone agency; and (d) disposed of the opening of the mobile phone in the name of 35-550,000 won to the “largephone”; and (e) thought the loan applicant to have the fee for the mobile phone, etc.; and (c) received the victim E’s personal identification card collected by TR company in the name of the victim through NA, and then received the victim’s name.

arrow