logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2015.01.08 2014고단37
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 24, 2013.

1. On November 4, 2011, the criminal defendant against the victim C stated that “The victim C would be entitled to obtain approval of the fund for supporting the establishment and competitiveness of Jeollabuk-do and the factory in relation to the F factories in the Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of business promotion expenses.”

However, even if the defendant received expenses from the victim, he was planned to use them as personal debt repayment, and in the case of a company operated by the victim, the defendant was not able to receive the above support fund due to a large debt, and the defendant who is well aware of this, did not have the intent or ability to obtain the above support fund and factory approval

Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 4,600,000 from the victim as business promotion expenses around November 4, 201, in total, KRW 67,363,721 from the above date and time to March 13, 2013, such as receiving the Defendant’s transfer of KRW 4,60,00 from the victim to the agricultural bank account in the name of G (H).

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 10, 2013, the criminal defendant against the victim I stated that “A victim I made a loan by allocating policy funds to a small and medium enterprise in Jeonnam-do, but the cost of reduction is changed so that a loan may be received at low interest.”

However, even if the defendant received expenses from the victim, he was planned to use them as personal debt repayment, and there was no intention or ability to enable the victim to get the above policy funds allocated and borrowed.

The defendant shall belong to this, under the name of the defendant, to KRW 1,900,000 as a loan fee from the victim.

arrow