1. The Defendant’s KRW 19,894,850 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 4, 2017 to April 5, 2018.

- Recognition and public announcement of the progress of adjudication - Urban Development Project (B(4th, 8th) - Public announcement: The Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced on May 19, 2010 C, D - Project operator: the Central Land Expropriation Committee’s announcement on November 10, 2016 - The expropriation adjudication on expropriation: 1,273 square meters before Seoyang-gu E (hereinafter “instant land”) and on its ground (hereinafter “instant obstacles”): 1,03,162,150 won (i.e., the land of this case’s 986,002,150 won) - The appraisal corporation’s appraisal value and damages for delay - The Plaintiff’s appraisal corporation’s appraisal value and damages for delay - the Plaintiff’s appraisal value and damages for delay - the Plaintiff’s appraisal corporation’s appraisal value and damages for delay - the Plaintiff’s appraisal value and damages for delay - the Plaintiff’s appraisal corporation’s appraisal value and damages for delay - - the Plaintiff’s appraisal value and damages for expropriation - - 150.

Judgment

In a lawsuit on the increase or decrease of compensation for expropriation, in case where there is no reason to believe that both the result of the adjudication and the result of the court appraisal are illegal and there is no evidence to prove that there is a special error in the contents of the appraisal, the more trust in any of the results of each appraisal belongs to the discretion

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Du4679, Jan. 28, 2005). With respect to the instant case, the health unit and the aforementioned.