logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.07.17 2014고단1377
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 15:00 on February 5, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim C told the victim C to pay in the office of the 7th floor E organization of the D Building in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “If the capital is insufficient to perform a new funeral, the victim C would be repaid in several months, and the interest will be known.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not think of a new funeral service, and there was no intention or ability to repay it.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, made a false statement to the victim, and received two million won from the victim.

2. Around 14:00 on November 16, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim F stated that the victim F would be immediately repaid after 1-2 months if he/she lends money to the victim F as he/she needs to engage in a new funeral service in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H market.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not think of a new funeral service, and there was no intention or ability to repay it.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, made a false statement to the victim, and received 4 million won from the victim.

3. Around 14:00 on December 31, 2010, the Defendant, who was in charge of a street store located in the fraud H H H market with the victim I, told the victim I to “h to see the job at a good street store that is located in the H market located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the victim I, in the vicinity of the grassbbbbbbre store located in the G G market.”

However, even if the defendant received the above money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to color the good place to use the borrowed money or to repay the borrowed money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim and received KRW 3 million from the victim on February 25, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The defendant;

arrow