logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.01.11 2015가단213060
보험금
Text

1. With respect to the accidents described in paragraph 2 of the Schedule, time-limit for the insurance contract described in paragraph 1 of the Schedule.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Basic Facts

(1) On March 21, 2008, the Defendant concluded an insurance contract with the insured on March 21, 2008, as shown in paragraph (1) of the attached Table attached hereto, with the insured as the Defendant (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

A) The instant insurance contract’s security items include the following items among the security items of the instant insurance contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant basic items”); the security items listed in the table 1 Nos. 2 below are “Items I of the instant special agreement”; and the security items listed in the table 3 Nos. 2 below are “Items II of the instant special agreement”.

(2) On March 21, 2008, on March 21, 2008, the general terms and conditions applicable to the instant basic items are as stated in Paragraph (1) of the “Contents of the Terms and Conditions”. The contents of the special terms and conditions applicable to the instant basic items are as stated in Paragraph (2) of the “Contents of the Terms and Conditions”. The contents of the special terms and conditions applicable to the instant basic items are as stated in Paragraph (3) of the “Contents of the Terms and Conditions”. The “Disability Classification” applicable to the instant basic items are as stated in Paragraph (1) of the “Contents of the Terms and Conditions”, and the “Disability Classification” applicable to the aforementioned general terms and conditions are as stated in Paragraph (3) of the “Contents of the Terms and Conditions”.

(1) On May 17, 2013, the Defendant suffered an injury, such as scarkeing, scarkeing, etc. while completing electric maintenance work in Daejeon-dong-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, with a scarke, while getting off the electric maintenance work of the telegraph (the accident listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table).

hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”

(2) On January 12, 2015, the Defendant claimed insurance proceeds based on the instant insurance contract in relation to the harm inflicted on the Plaintiff due to the instant accident.

3) Meanwhile, at the time of the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, the Defendant had been working as the “Electric Product Repair Service,” and was working as the “Electric Safety Technology Operator” at the time of the instant accident. [In the event that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, A, Nos. 1, 2, 5, 8 through 11, 14, and Nos. 2, 3, 5, and 2, 5.

arrow