logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.07.28 2014고단3495
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant

A or C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant A and C, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, from around 2007 to December 2, 2010, is a person who works as the construction chairperson of the G church in the Republic of Korea F and has been engaged in the business of managing funds related to new church construction. A.

The Defendant, at a place where it is difficult to know the place around October 6, 2008, received KRW 30 million from the Defendant’s wife C who managed the funds of the said G church under the pretext of expenses related to new construction of the said G church, etc., and embezzled them for personal purposes around that time while being in custody.

B. On January 18, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 20 million from the Defendant’s wife C, who managed the said GD Fund, in the name of part payment of the site related to the construction of the said GDD, from the victim’s wife, and paid KRW 10 million, which was returned to B, and embezzled by arbitrarily using it for personal purposes around that time.

C. On July 5, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 5 million, which is the victim’s members of the above GG church, from the Defendant’s wife C, who managed the funds of the above GG church, under the pretext of expenses related to new construction of the above GG church, and embezzled them for personal purposes around that time.

2. Defendant C is a person who works as a member of the above G church from around 2007 to December 201, 201 and has been engaged in managing church funds.

On January 24, 2008, the Defendant embezzled KRW 57,200,000 for personal purposes from that time to December 1, 2010, when managing accounts in the name of the above association, and keeping the church donation, etc. owned by the members of the above association, which is a victim, for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A and C.

arrow