1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) stated in the corresponding “total” column in the attached Table 1 against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and related thereto.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company aimed at taxi transportation business, etc.

B. The plaintiffs were employed by the defendant and worked as a taxi driver. The plaintiffs' service period is as shown below.

In cases of Plaintiff B from September 7, 2010 to March 31, 2015, the period of service of Plaintiff B 2 B from October 19, 2012 to March 12, 2015 is from September 30, 2012 to March 9, 2015, the period of service of Plaintiff B is from September 30, 2012 to March 9, 2015 on the business owner’s written confirmation (Evidence A 1) such as overdue wages, but the average wage and retirement allowance calculation (Evidence 7-2) is from October 19, 2012 to March 12, 2015. The latter is deemed the period of service of the Plaintiff.

3. From May 1, 2008 to February 13, 2015, 4D 2012 from September 12, 2012 to September 30, 2015, 5 E from September 30, 2014 to March 30, 2015, 6F from April 1, 2014 to May 15, 2015, 7 G G 7 until May 30, 2013 to May 31, 2015; 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. As to the main claim

A. As to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiffs were not paid wages from the Defendant from November 2014 to January 2015 as indicated below.

The Plaintiffs’ unpaid wages (won) up to December 2014, 2014, up to December 2014, 198,104, 650, 178, 800, 527 1,648,648, 809 2 B B 199, 91361, 812 777, 131,588, 8563 C 197,270, 591, 8123, 823, 9231, 613, 0054 D203,946, 760, 6461, 610, 9015, 207, 257, 1967, 197, 1967, 637, 6198, 637, 6197, 1967, 6197

(The difference between the plaintiffs' claim amount relating to retirement allowances and the amount recognized by this court is deemed to be due to the difference in the calculation method of the number of years of continuous employment, and the amount shall be calculated according to the calculation method adopted by this court). The amount of retirement allowances of the plaintiff below 1 A4,037,502 (2,651,422 ±90 days) x 4 year and 6 months/12 months.