logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.04.24 2016고단5607
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) is a person engaged in driving a CMF rocketing car.

On March 30, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on March 14:27, 2016, which led to the passage of the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the four-lane roads in front of the wetlands ecological park in the future, along two-lanes.

The Defendant had a duty of care to look at the e-mail driven by the victim D (n, 34 years old) and to prevent accidents from occurring due to the following behind the passenger car. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to look at the e-mail and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and to prevent accidents from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting his duty at the front week, found that the injured party was late to go on the front body of the vehicle, and received the benz car that the injured party driven by the fronter of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the foregoing occupational negligence, suffered from the victim’s light fluorum in need of treatment for about three weeks, and, at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the damaged vehicle and taking necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person, even though the damaged vehicle was damaged to have an amount equivalent to KRW 5,484,160.

2. No owner of an automobile who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall operate an automobile not subscribed to the automobile liability insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant owned CF Launa car and operated the said car at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, instead of purchasing liability insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Mandatory insurance (C) 1.

arrow