logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2016.05.31 2015가단6009
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. All the costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff asserted that from around 2005, 204, the Plaintiff raised 124 pieces of alteration in the Mine-si C Forest (hereinafter “the instant forest”). However, around December 2014, the Defendant Mine-si Forestry Cooperatives (hereinafter “the Defendant Cooperatives”) established a forest where the Plaintiff was raising bees of bees in front of the Plaintiff that was raising bees of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of 80,00,00 won (the person in charge of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes of bes).

B. Around May 2014, the Defendants’ assertion was given notice to the owner of the instant forest that he/she would build a forest stuff and shores from the shores for landscaping stone (hereinafter “instant construction”). From September 19, 2014 to October 26, 2014, for the total nine-day construction of a foundation for a forest road stuffing station between September 19, 2014 and October 26, 2014, the Defendant passed by ready-mixed vehicles or opened on the shores for landscaping stone.

There was no death of the Plaintiff due to the construction of the Defendant Union at the time, and there was no fact that the Plaintiff confirmed the details of damage to the Defendants.

2. As alleged by the Plaintiff, there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant Union had established the instant construction around December 2014, and there is no clear proof as to the amount of damage claimed by the Plaintiff.

In addition, as the plaintiff's own assertion, the first verification of the death of part of the penalty in the form of a penalty on February 2015 and the second verification around April 2015 that approximately 80 copies of the penalty were abolished. As such, it is recognized that the death of the death was caused by the construction of this case even if it was alleged.

arrow