logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단723
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of Brodis joints.

1. On December 24, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “the Road Traffic Act”) led directly to the marketing distance from the window in Changwon-si, Changwon-si on December 24, 2013.

Since there are many vehicles, in such cases, the driver has a duty of care to live well with the front left and to secure the safety distance and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop due to negligence while driving the Madyna-motor vehicle of the victim C (mae, 52 years old) who was under the stop due to the traffic congestion, shocked with the part of the back of the Hadyna-motor vehicle of the victim C (mae, 52 years old) driving with the front part of the Hadya-motor vehicle of the Hadya-motor vehicle of the victim E (mae, 30 years old) who was under the influence of the Hadya-motor vehicle, and caused the back part of the Hady-motor vehicle of the Hady-motor vehicle of the victim E (Me, 30 years old) who was under the influence of the Hadya-motor vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above job performance results in the victim C with approximately two weeks of elbow bows, etc., and at the same time, damaged the victim E with approximately KRW 1,345,813, and KRW 3,562,082, and KRW 439,281, each of the repair costs, such as the exchange of back strings of the above E-owned motor vehicles for repair, including the exchange of back strings of the above E-owned motor vehicles for repair.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is to operate an automobile without mandatory insurance at the same time and at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the evidence list Nos. 1 to 4, 9 to 18, submitted by the prosecutor

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow