logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.03.03 2016고단2093
강제추행등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and the defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one thousand won.

2. Defendant B is the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, around April 10, 2016, at the F clubs located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul around 04:10, she committed an indecent act by force by putting the part of the victim G (at the age of 25) on his/her entrance and humping his/her head as his/her hand.

2. The Defendants: (a) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) Defendant A’s hand who was requested from the victim H (30 years of age) of the above G to kill the victim’s neck; (c) Defendant B was involved in the act; (d) the victim’s breath by taking the victim’s neck; and (e) the victim’s breath by taking the breath from the victim’s Ha (30 years of age); and (e) Defendant A continued to keep the victim’s head knish.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the right side of the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

Each fact in the judgment

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects against Defendant A by the prosecution

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement of G and H;

1. A photo of the part damaged by the victim H;

1. Data from CCTV images inside a F club;

1. In full view of the medical certificates, etc., each of them can be recognized, and all of them are proven.

그런데 판시 제 1의 사실에 관하여 피고인 A 및 변호인은 위 피고인이 피해자의 머리 뒷부분을 손바닥으로 톡톡 건드린 사실만 있을 뿐 피해자의 허리를 감 싸 안거나 머리를 쓰다듬지는 아니하였다고

The argument is asserted.

According to the above CCTV screen, it is apparent that the above defendant has taken back the back of the victim as he rhyth with his left hand. In this case, the part of the above defendant's left elbow is coming to the victim's, etc., and the damages of the above defendant do not appear in the above video, and not only did the defendant's left hand appear in the above video but also prevented H before the victim's right hand gets out of the victim's dancing.

Therefore, the above evidence, especially the G investigative agency and the legal statement of the damaged person (which is so far) can not be determined.

arrow