logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.02.03 2015나305977
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 16:00 on June 6, 2014, the Plaintiff, along with Defendant B, was involved in an accident that fell off on the e-mail while performing the funeral work in the Daegu-based E-cafeteria operated by Defendant C.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

On June 7, 2014, the following day after the instant accident occurred, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the F Hospital. On June 7, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Hembane’s surrounding land and power lines, damage to the heat, etc.

C. Since November 5, 2015, the Plaintiff received treatment from H hospitals, I hospitals, J hospitals, K Hospitalss, dental clinics, Yong-Namnam University Medical Center, L Hospitals, etc., and received a prescription from Ma pharmacies, N Pharmaciess, and O pharmacies.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including branch numbers), the fact-finding results on the Daegu regional headquarters of the court of first instance, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff asserted that he fells in the cafeteria operated by the defendant C with the instruction of the defendant B and sustained injuries such as putting the left shoulder at the port while performing the cafeteria work. Thus, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiff the medical expenses of KRW 500,00,000, the amount of damages for future treatment expenses of KRW 7,500,000, the amount of damages for future treatment expenses of KRW 5,000,000, the amount of damages for delay, and the amount of damages for delay.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion by the Defendants cannot be deemed to have suffered injury due to the instant accident, and even if the causal relationship between the instant accident and the Plaintiff’s injury is acknowledged, the Defendants did not err in relation to the instant accident.

3. The fact that the Plaintiff received medical treatment from the F Hospital, Garyary medicine clinic, H hospital, and J Hospital from November 5, 2015 after the instant accident occurred is acknowledged as seen earlier, and according to the evidence No. 2-2 and evidence No. 1-1 and No. 2-2, the Defendants are also found to bear the Plaintiff’s medical expenses, MRI photographing expenses, etc.

arrow