A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 22, 2017, at the front of the apartment management office of 208:00, the Defendant: (a) committed a conflict with a taxi engineer at the 1st century in front of the apartment complex management office; (b) on the 1st century, at the time of the Government around 08:00, the Defendant sent a taxi engineer at the 112 report; (c) on the part of the police officer who was dispatched to the site, sent the taxi engineer at first to the 2nd century; (d) on the part of the police officer at the 112 report, the Defendant: (a) provided that the police officer was only a taxi engineer, thereby preventing the police officer from getting off the patrol car; and (b) assaulted the chest part of the breast part of the blue zone with the blue part; and (c) committed an act of spreading it over the ground.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Photographs damaged police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a mobile phone closure photograph and cell phone image CD data;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 69(1) of the Criminal Act: (a) the degree of interference with public duties by a police officer who intends to move to another place different from the reason for sentencing is not easy; (b) the defendant has been punished for a fine of one million won due to damage to public goods in 2014; (c) the defendant has a profoundly reflect on his fault; and (d) the defendant has no criminal record other than the previous offense;