logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.08.16 2016나20139
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against Defendant Republic of Korea in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A’s fall accident 1) Plaintiff A, from February 15, 2014 to February 17:40, 2014, Plaintiff A, an IMour in Daegu Seo-gu H (hereinafter “instant Mour”).

(2) The Defendant C, D, and E, etc., who wereK belonging to the Daegu Western Police Station, installed a fish set up on the ground near the 1st floor of this case in preparation for the fall of Plaintiff A, and installed a crypt sales unit on the 3st floor of the instant crypt. (2) A, who arrived at the site around 18:40 of the same day, fell under the crypt lease installed on the 3rd floor of the instant crypt. (3rd of the instant crypt.) while the J, who attempted to communicate with the said Plaintiff, fell under the crypt lease installed on the 3rd floor of the instant crypt. (18:50 of the same day, was sent back to the crypted Medical Center by police officers on the 119 first aid workers at the scene.

B. After the police investigation and emergency arrest of the plaintiff A, the above police officers requested the plaintiff A to undergo a urine test at the Daegu Western Police Station's Criminal Department's Office in the form of voluntary operation of the plaintiff A at the KJ at the time of the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff A had placed the urine phone in his/her own urine, and the police officers agreed to the request the plaintiff A to submit the plaintiff's urine voluntarily, and did not have any response to the urine. 2) The plaintiff A requested the police officers in charge to send the urine to the urine because there was no response to the urine. However, the police officers in charge again requested the examination as other urine, and again conducted the urine test, which is the documentary examination of the above urine as another urine, as a result of the emergency arrest, and the police officers did not respond to the plaintiff A's urine without any response to the son's urine.

C. The plaintiff A.

arrow