1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 35,000,000 to Plaintiff A, and 5% per annum from November 9, 2013 to January 20, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendants are doctors working in the Busan Suwon-gu H I Hospital.

B. On August 201, 201, Plaintiff A was diagnosed by J Hospital and K Hospital, and was enrolled in the I Hospital working for the Defendants on September 2, 2011.

C. On September 2, 2011, Defendant F conducted an early-wave test with the Plaintiff on September 2, 201, and diagnosed the Plaintiff as a prone to the Rose of Sharon, a prone to the Rose of Sharon, and a result report on the diagnosis and examination of Rose of Sharon, etc., by referring to the result of the examination of Rose of Sharon, and the result report on the diagnosis and examination, etc., Defendant F tried to implement the Plaintiff’s prone to Rose of Sharon C through

Plaintiff

A From around 10:00 on September 6, 201, from 10:0 to 10, at I Hospital, received from the Defendants a self-satisfying operation for the satisfying of the satfinite (hereinafter “instant operation”).

At the time, Defendant F collected surgery, and Defendant G was in charge of anesthesia.

E. On September 6, 201, while conducting the instant surgery, the Plaintiff’s heart was suspended on September 11:15, 201, and the Plaintiff’s blood pressure was reduced along with a serious blue certificate.

F. The Defendants immediately suspended surgery, and performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation to Plaintiff A, and at the same time performed emergency measures such as administering Ephedrine, Epinehrine, A.M.P.

G. On September 6, 2011, Plaintiff A restored to the state of the Plaintiff at his/her heart around 11:45, and thereafter, the Defendants continuously observed the status of Plaintiff A and transferred Plaintiff A to Busan University Hospital around 13:10 on September 6, 201.

H. On September 6, 201, Plaintiff A transferred to Busan University Hospital on September 13:46, 201, and at the time of arrival Plaintiff A was in a state where Plaintiff A did not have any eye and did not have any physical reaction.

I. At present, Plaintiff A loses 100% of its labor ability due to low oxygen cerebral brain damage and spathy.

(j) Plaintiff B’s husband, Plaintiff C’s children, Plaintiff D, and E are the parents of Plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 11, Eul evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 6-1, 2, Eul evidence 7-1, 2, Eul evidence 8, 9, Eul evidence 10-2, Eul evidence 10.