beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for five months and by imprisonment for four months.
except that for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 01:50 on September 15, 2013, the Defendants’ co-offenders were subject to questioning of personal information from the Namyang Police Station E-gu, the Namyang Police Station E-gu, who was dispatched after receiving a report on 112 that Defendant A would not have any Defendant B, who would go to the house, for the reasons that Defendant B could not have a house. In the process, the Defendants were subject to questioning of personal information from Defendant B.
Defendant
B The above police officers expressed their desire to “I see why you can see, she can see, see, and she can do so in accordance with the principle of female friendliness.” Defendant A expressed her desire to “I see, she will see, she will do so,” and Defendant A expressed her desire to “I see, she will see, she will do so,” and she will walk the chest and shoulder of the above F with her chest and shoulder by hand, etc. Defendant B assaulted Defendant B, who was arrested as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties due to the above act, and she was arrested by Defendant B as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and she assaulted Defendant B her back, and her face was hick G that is arrested by Defendant B flagrant offender, and she sawed, spawned, or plafed, by assaulting the left hand.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning crime prevention and investigation.
2. 피고인 A 피고인은 2013. 9. 15. 02:03경 제1항 기재와 같은 이유로 현행범인으로 체포되어 남양주경찰서 E파출소로 인치된 후, 위 B의 수갑이 너무 세게 채워졌으니 풀어달라고 소리를 지르며 위 파출소 안을 돌아다니다가, 이를 제지하는 위 F(38세)의 가랑이를 발로 1회 걷어찼다.
As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer's criminal investigation, and at the same time, the victim was faced with the back-to-date medical treatment for about seven days.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Prosecutions and police officers against the Defendants.