The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in light of all the sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (three years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is erroneous, and there is no history that the defendant has been punished heavier than a fine. However, each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant intentionally caused a traffic accident against many unspecified persons by using professional knowledge and experience that the defendant has gained while working as an insurance solicitor, and obtained it by unfairly claiming insurance money under the name of vehicle repair expenses, medical expenses, agreement amount, etc., which are covered by the above accident. The crime of this case is committed by deceiving eight insurance companies over 36 times in total for a period exceeding 3 years, since the nature of the crime is very poor, and the crime of this case is committed by deceiving 8 insurance companies over 36 times in total, and the scale and period of the crime is considerable, but it is difficult to reach an agreement with the damaged company or to repay the damage therefrom, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, it is not unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.