logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.12 2018노1083
보험사기방지특별법위반등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, for a year of imprisonment for a defendant B, and for a defendant C.

Reasons

1. In light of the overall sentencing conditions of the reasons for appeal, the respective sentence of the court below (Defendant A: imprisonment of 1 year and 2 months; imprisonment of 1 year and 1 year; Defendant C: Imprisonment of 8 months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is that each of the above crimes committed by the defendants in collusion with the accomplices and caused a traffic accident against the car that changed the tea line, and then acquired the above accident by unfairly claiming insurance money under the name of agreement, treatment expenses, vehicle repair expenses, etc. The insurance fraud is likely to increase insurance cost and damage many insurance subscribers. In addition, the defendants appear to have caused a lot of mental distress to the individual drivers designated as the perpetrator in the course of intentionally causing a traffic accident, and there is a very poor crime, and there is a serious social harm. The above crimes committed by the defendants A are about 850,000 won in total, and each of the above crimes committed by the defendants Eul were committed more than 10 times in total for about 1 year and 8 months, and there is a need to punish each of the above crimes committed by the defendants C for about 4 months in total, up to 520,000 won in total, and it is recognized that there is a need to punish each of the above crimes by the defendants C for a total of 7 months or more.

However, it appears that all the Defendants were able to repent of their wrong lives through detention, and all the Defendants appear to have led to the crimes of this case without proper awareness of the social prejudice of each of the above crimes in the situation where they began to lead a social life by living in 1995, and there is room for some consideration in the circumstances of the crimes of this case. The frequency of each of the crimes of this case and the amount of damage caused thereby.

arrow