logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.24 2015가단112311
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 27,787,870; (b) KRW 18,025,247; and (c) KRW 18,025,247, and each of the said money to Plaintiff A, from April 2, 2015 to April 2, 2016.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C around April 2, 2015: (a) around 05:14, 2015, C is a D-car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) at a very rapid speed at a four-lane road 64 kilometers in the direction of transmission along the outer circular road, the outer circular road, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu.

b)E 15 tons car truck (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) driven by driving on the two-lanes from the side of the two-lanes to the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the above road, proceeding ahead of the three-lanes while changing the two-lane lines.

(B) The Plaintiff caused the accident that caused the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle to the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to negligence not finding the Defendant’s wife (hereinafter “instant accident”).

A) C died on the same day due to the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

(2) At the time of the instant accident, the main background of the instant accident is as follows: (a) At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant’s front and right side of the Defendant’s vehicle are installed on one side; (b) the Defendant’s front side and right side of the instant accident; (c) the Defendant’s work, etc. was installed on one side; (d) but the left side of the tail, etc. was cut off (in the case of No. 1, it is not believed that the No. 1 was written); and (e) the remainder of the U.S. and the work, etc. were weak compared to the vehicles on which the Defendant’s vehicle was close at the time

On the other hand, unlike the defendant's assertion, it was difficult to install street lamps at the accident site of this case.

3) Plaintiff A’s legal spouse, Plaintiff B’s legal heir, and C’s legal heir, and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a mutual aid agreement on the Defendant’s vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Party A’s 1 through 8, Party A’s 21, and Party B’s 22 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry or video, the whole purport of the pleading;

B. According to the above recognition of the limitation of liability, the accident of this case is attributable to the deceased's negligence and street, etc. who neglected the front-time watch while drinking.

arrow