The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the facts charged is the chairperson of the promotion committee for the renewal promotion district in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim D is the member of the promotion committee for the renewal promotion district.

On January 2014, the Defendant did not have any record of being punished for fraud at the office of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee for Promotion of Zones E, and even though he did not have committed an corruption at the time when he owned a site in the said C zone or performed the duties of the head of the F apartment association, the Defendant, despite the fact, against G and H, a promotion member of the said C zone renewal promotion district, “D is replaced by fraud.”

“D has earned a large amount of money at the time of the president of the F Apartment Association.”

“D”, “D has committed fraud to a reduction in prison.”

“D” and “D would be the head of the promotion committee and the partnership in order to receive compensation by raising the appraisal value at a few times in the zone C as the site was 400 square meters or more, and the appraisal value was increased.

“A false statement was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Determination and conclusion of the instant facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act, as a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the same Act.

Since the victim expressed his intention not to be punished against the defendant in this court after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.