(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.22 2015나29120

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.22 2015나29120

사해행위취소

Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

1/2.0 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet between the defendant and C

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, since the court's reasoning for this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the cases being changed or added as follows, it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Parts to be dried or added;

(a) Court rulings of the first instance;

1. At the end of paragraph (b) of the basic fact, the Plaintiff and C added the amount of KRW 10 million to the lease deposit, instead of the Plaintiff’s repair, to the lease deposit, which increased the lease deposit to KRW 110 million in total.”

(b) the third third "10,000,000" shall be added to "110,000,000" to "6th, 8th,000,000,000".

C. From the seventh 10th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th 2008, the lease contract was concluded between the Plaintiff on February 12, 2008 by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 100,000,00 with respect to the apartment of this case for the period from March 208 to 24th 208, and the lease contract was concluded between the Plaintiff on February 12, 2008, and the lease contract was concluded on September 6, 2009 to increase the lease deposit amount of this case to KRW 110,000,000.”

On the 12th judgment of the first instance court, the "10,000,000 won" shall be added to "11,000,000 won" from the 4th and the 6th to the following.

3. If so, the sales contract concluded on January 20, 2010 between the defendant and C as to the 1/2 share of the apartment of this case constitutes a fraudulent act. Thus, the above sales contract is revoked within the limit of KRW 110 million, and the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 110 million per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from the day following the day when the judgment of this case becomes final to the day of complete payment. Thus, the plaintiff is obligated to pay the plaintiff the damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 110 million per annum as stipulated in the Civil

참조조문

-민법

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2015.07.17 2014나14304

-대전지방법원 2015.06.10 2015나869

-서울북부지방법원 2016.01.29 2015나4090

-수원지방법원 2014.12.23 2013나43694

-부산지방법원 2020. 12. 11. 선고 2020나49713 판결