logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.23 2013나43694
수수료
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following 2. Reasons for the rejection of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(G) The first instance court's findings and judgments should not be different in light of the evidence added in the trial). 2. The second instance court's "five million won" in the third instance court's decision No. 3, 131, 612, 822 shall be added to "one million won".

The following shall be added between the five pages 2 and 3 of the first instance judgment:

The other party may terminate this contract without a peremptory notice when two months have elapsed since the default of the obligation by either party under Article 32(4) of the Act. In the event that a company falls under any of the following subparagraphs, the agency of 33(3) seeks correction with a peremptory notice prior to ten days prior to the filing of the suit, and in the absence of correction, it may terminate or rescind this contract. In the event that payment of the commission is delayed for not less than two months without justifiable cause, subparagraph 1 of this Article shall lose the benefit of the company; 2: Where it is difficult to collect the assistance goods without justifiable cause and make normal business difficult: 3: Other company shall violate this contract; where the purpose of the contract is not achieved due to such violation, the following shall be added between the five pages 5 and 6 of the first instance judgment; 33(3) Agency shall have no dispute; 5, 10 or 11 of the entire decision of the first instance court; 33(3) Agency shall have to pay the management fee to the Plaintiff:

The plaintiff's above assertion on the premise that the termination of the defendant's above is illegal is without merit.

Article 32(2)1 and Article 32(2)1 of the instant contract, which stipulates as the grounds for termination of the Defendant’s contract where the agency’s business activities are extremely poor.

arrow